• Event Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Donate
  • News
    • Blog
    • Submit a Blog Post
    • News Releases
    • Letters to Decision Makers
    • MEP in the News
  • About Us
    • Staff & Board
    • Contact MEP
    • Member Organizations
    • Become a Member
    • Minnesota’s Environmental and Conservation Community
      • MEP Commitment to Environmental Justice
  • Issues
    • 2025 Policy Priorities
    • 2024 Legislative Wrap-Up
    • Line 3 Pipeline
    • Climate & Energy
    • Water
    • Transportation
    • Great Lakes
    • Protecting Pollinators
    • Sulfide Mining
  • Get Involved
    • Voter Resources
    • Take Action
    • Subscribe
  • Job Board
    • Post a Job
 

Clean Water

Clean Energy

Transportation

Get Involved

[VIDEO] Steve talks about a bad bill that repeals protections of our water, health, more

Posted February 21st, 2012 by Minnesota Environmental Partnership.

MEP’s executive director Steve Morse was interviewed by the Cucking Stool yesterday after he testified in the Senate State Government Innovation committee against Senate File 1922, a very bad bill that repeals all rules from five state agencies: PCA, DNR, BWSR, EQB and Dept. of Ag. These rules involve protections of our drinking water, mercury, regulating waste in our water, the health of our milk, our air quality, pipeline safety, and more.

Read full post over at the Cucking Stool’s website

Filed under Civic Engagement, Funding for the Environment, Health, Legislature, Loon Commons blog, Policy Update, Water

3 Responses to “[VIDEO] Steve talks about a bad bill that repeals protections of our water, health, more”

  1. Steve Timmer February 22, 2012

    The hearing opened with Sen. John Pederson, one of the chief authors of the bill, loudly protesting, MEP’s press release on the effect of the bill’s repealer section. He called the press release a serious misrepresentation.

    But readers ought to go to Section 13, Subdivision 2 of SF1922 and decide for themselves who is the mis-representer.

    Senator Pederson was either 1) so misinformed about his own bill that he doesn’t know what it says, or 2) he was lying.

  2. Megan March 7, 2012

    The bill language on the legislature’s webpage only has 9 sections. I’m confused regarding the reference to Section 13 above.

  3. Steve Timmer March 18, 2012

    It’s possible the bill has been amended since the video was shot; I don’t have the time to check at the moment, but you can look at the history of the bill and see what amendments were made. I will try to do that in coming days, but no promises.

Members Only
MN Environmental Job Board
Subscribe

Some photos courtesy of Paul Stafford, © Explore Minnesota Tourism

Minnesota Environmental Partnership | 318 Landmark Center, 75 West 5th St, Saint Paul, MN 55102 | 651.290.0154